Saturday, December 30, 2017

Lady Bird (2017)

Home is where the heart is, and for Christine McPhearson aka "Lady Bird", that is not in her native home of Sacramento, California. "Lady Bird" is the self-given nickname for her and she only wants to be known by that name. What's in a name anyway? This film chronicles the rebellious teenager as she struggles with her family life, friends and personal identity. I haven't seen this good of a coming-of-age film since 2014' s "Boyhood". Though this film didn't take nearly as long to film, it's very similar to that film, when it comes to the subject. This film is an amazing, highly rare film of the indie genre that goes unrecognized at times.

Job well done Ms. Gerwig! Making her sensational directorial debut, Greta Gerwig, uses heart at the center of this emotionally charged film. It's also a film that has the usual teenage, adolenscent, drama that insues for what feels like an eternity, but it isn't. There is an ocassional slip of dry humor but, overall, dull. This film is mainly a drama. But can also be labeled as a Dramedy-(Dramatic Comedy).

The performances in this stunningly, relatable film, are absolutely jaw-dropping. Starring as the self-titled nickname, Saoirse Ronan plays a very convincing teenager, in reality Ronan is much older than 17. Ronan plays "LB" in a gracefully combative way. Her character is the pinnacle of this film. She is immense in her rebelliousness and it's extremely well performed. Also, making a shine at it, is Laurie Metcalf. She plays LB's mother in a protective, overbearing way and it may just well be one of the best performances of the year for actresses. Same goes for Ronan.

The film does have wonderful performances, but it also has amazing stories and dramatic efforts too. It plays out on screen playfully among the other characters seen in the film. This film is a whirlwind of drama.

She's bold. She's fierce. And she's determined. For "LB" life as a teenager was rough. She has wanted to make a pathway of her own. This is one film, along with other films possessing similar quailities this film must be seen by teens everywhere-(Not because I'm telling you too. But because you can relate to this film on all it talks about. I have no doubt in my mind I will be rooting this on and it's creator and performers during this award season.


Rate: A+ 

Director: Greta Gerwig 

Starring: Saoirse Ronan, Laurie Metcalf, Tracey Letts, Beanie Feldstein, with Lucas Hedges and Timothee Chalamet

MPAA Rating: R-(for language, sexual content, brief graphic nudity and teen partying)

Runtime: 1 Hour and 35 Minutes 

Synopsis: In Lady Bird, Greta Gerwig reveals herself to be a bold new cinematic voice with her directorial debut, excavating both the humor and pathos in the turbulent bond between a mother and her teenage daughter. Christine "Lady Bird" McPherson (Saoirse Ronan) fights against but is exactly like her wildly loving, deeply opinionated and strong-willed mom (Laurie Metcalf), a nurse working tirelessly to keep her family afloat after Lady Bird's father (Tracy Letts) loses his job. Set in Sacramento, California in 2002, amidst a rapidly shifting American economic landscape, Lady Bird is an affecting look at the relationships that shape us, the beliefs that define us, and the unmatched beauty of a place called home.
















   


Malawski’s Movie Rating System

A+ = Exceptional, One of a Kind, Masterpiece. Definite award season contender
A= Pure enjoyment, happy feeling. Satisfaction
A- = One to remember. Unforgettable
B+ = Can get a little over the top. But, it makes out as a good film.
B= This film has the potential to be better. Lacks in consistency
B- = Watches occasionally
C+ = Guilty pleasure territory
C= Causes viewer frustration due to lack of depth in the story
C-= Meh
D+ = I hated this movie. Some parts were good. Overall, the film was garbage
D= Very few to no good parts about this movie
D- = Minimal qualities of excellence

F= Don’t even bother watching it. It’s that bad.

Coco (2017)

Pixars line of movies consists of this: What if Toys had feelings, What if Bugs had feelings, Cars, Feelings have feelings, and last: What if the dead had feelings? Pixars latest tackles the annual Mexican holiday Dia De Muertos aka "Day of the Dead". This festive celebration is when ancestors who have died go back to see their living relatives. Now if you ask me, this holiday sounds like it's a bunch of voodoo, but that's how I see it. Once I saw this film, I knew I'd get an education on this holiday, celebrated by millions.

This film may not have comedy, maybe a little, but, this film is a beautiful, colorful and detailed piece of work. Perhaps it is one of the most visually stunning films I have seen this year. What makes this film so colorful, is the detail and all that the film shows. It's truly something that is spectacular.

Director Lee Unkrich, works his way in this film gracefully and so authentically, that those who didn't know what this holiday is,  like I did before watching this, you will know. The nature of this film is dark, but it's presented in way that isn't too dark. only colorful. So colorful, that you 'll be wanting to go to the "Land of The Dead" just like our main character.

Veteran Pixar composer, Michael Giacchino, makes a festive, upbeat sound for the film. It goes hand-in-hand with the original songs in the film as well, which are also just as good as the score.

Our main character, Miguel, an aspiring musician, tries to participate in a show in his local town in Mexico, his family harps on his dreams to do so because the family is "cursed". His "great-great grandfather" a popular singer and musician Hector, has talents so big, that his double great grandson mistook him for another popular singer and musician. Anthony Gonzalez, plays Miguel. He does a really good job at capturing the essence of what the human experience yearns for. Goals. Dreams. Ambition. Destiny.

The only main problem I have with this film really, is that it seems to me that "Disney/Pixar" likes to include characters so dim witted that it's almost insulting to those real individuals who may have developmental disabilities. This all started with last years "Finding Dory"  with Gerald, a dim-witted sea lion who just wants to be accepted. This film, uses a dog, named Dante. It's one of the only beefs I have with this film, because of the recurring pattern here, and it needs to stop.

Are you ready for a cultural shock? Hang on, because you're about to experience an adventure unlike anything you've seen in cinema this year. The films mantra is "Seize Your Moment". This means you should take after anything you desire, even though others will try and stop you from being yourself and doing what you love. Pixars latest is a remarkable achievement, even if it suffers mildly for the mockery of the intellectually disabled. So, are you going to "Seize Your Moment"?

Rate: B+ 

Director: Lee Unkrich

Starring: Anthony Gonzalez, Benjamin Bratt, Gael Garcia-Bernal, with Renee Victor and Alanna Ubach

MPAA Rating: PG-(for thematic elements) 

Synopsis: The story follows a 12-year-old boy named Miguel Rivera who is accidentally transported to the land of the dead, where he seeks the help of his deceased musician great-great-grandfather to return him to his family among the living.

Runtime: 1 Hour & 50 Minutes 




Photo: Disney/Pixar















Malawski’s Movie Rating System

A+ = Exceptional, One of a Kind, Masterpiece. Definite award season contender
A= Pure enjoyment, happy feeling. Satisfaction
A- = One to remember. Unforgettable
B+ = Can get a little over the top. But, it makes out as a good film.
B= This film has the potential to be better. Lacks in consistency
B- = Watches occasionally
C+ = Guilty pleasure territory
C= Causes viewer frustration due to lack of depth in the story
C-= Meh
D+ = I hated this movie. Some parts were good. Overall, the film was garbage
D= Very few to no good parts about this movie
D- = Minimal qualities of excellence
F= Don’t even bother watching it. It’s that bad.





The Case For Christ (2017)

In 1980's Chicago, investigative journalist for the "Chicago Tribune", Lee Strobel wrestles with God. He is an Athiest, turned Christian. He spent a few years desparately trying to debunk Christianity and God. He realizes that there is indeed a God and that he now has faith. Hollywood hasn't been real good at depicting Christ in a must have, inclusive way. Like it does with other groups of people. This film sets a precedent over all films trying to depict God, but fail to do it in a original way.

This is one of 2017's most touching films. Granted that other films like: "God's Not Dead" and "Son of God" are Christ-centered films, they didn't reach an emotional impact on those who may be struggling with their faith. This film is a wonderful depiction of how God reaches the Lost.

Actor Mike Vogel did an amazing and powerful performance of the acclaimed journalist turned pastor and professor. He presents Strobel as a major skeptic of Christ. And it's very alarming. You see the impact he makes on screen with his wife Leslie, who is a devout Christian. Their marriage crumbles at the helm of Lee because of his beliefs and work life also.

The studio Pure Flix does an amazing job with this film. They present a way how one can find faith in Christ. It's amazing to see, even as a christ follower, the impact is immense.

WE BELIEVE! Oh wait that's from a different christ-centered film, but it still pertains to this and anything really. This film is a staple into those films based on faith. The faith-based film genre hasn't sat well with Hollywood in regards to the idea of this genre becoming mainstream. It's very refreshing to see a film that sets the standard for that genre.

Rate: A-

Director: Jon Gunn

Starring: Mike Vogel , Erika Christiansen, Robert Forester, Faye Dunaway and L. Scott Cadwell 

MPAA Rating: PG

Runtime: 2 Hours 

Synopsis: In 1980, former atheist and award-winning investigative journalist Lee Strobel applies his journalistic and legal skills to attempt to disprove his wife Leslie's newfound Christian faith, which causes problems within his marriage. After completing a thorough investigation for almost two years he finds the historical evidence for Jesus, and then finds a new faith in Christ.

Photo: Pure Flix














Malawski’s Movie Rating System

A+ = Exceptional, One of a Kind, Masterpiece. Definite award season contender
A= Pure enjoyment, happy feeling. Satisfaction
A- = One to remember. Unforgettable
B+ = Can get a little over the top. But, it makes out as a good film.
B= This film has the potential to be better. Lacks in consistency
B- = Watches occasionally
C+ = Guilty pleasure territory
C= Causes viewer frustration due to lack of depth in the story
C-= Meh
D+ = I hated this movie. Some parts were good. Overall, the film was garbage
D= Very few to no good parts about this movie
D- = Minimal qualities of excellence

F= Don’t even bother watching it. It’s that bad.








Wednesday, December 27, 2017

Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle (2017)

When it was first announced over a year ago that a sequel-of sorts to the iconic Robin Williams film was in the works, I was floored. I thought that Hollywood cannot dishonor one of its greats by trashing a film like 1995's "Jumanji", a film that is also based on the popular children's book. It would get completely trashed for Williams' absence. Oh boy was I wrong. This film does justice to the original. It may be even better. For that alone, I think Williams would be proud of this film and all its amazement.

The promotional material for the film: still photos, trailers, etcetera, made it look horrible and I had already made up my mind. Thinking that this film was going to be trash wasn't the right thing to do. This film is hilarious. It's entertaining and action-packed, and it's also, touching. Director Jake Kasdan crafts a special, action film that has lots of comedy, including (several male genitalia jokes), which, by the way, is something that makes the film more entertaining.

What's completely genius about this film, is having the game as a video game, instead of the original board game. On top of all that, the characters in the film, four teenage deliquents, who are stuck in dentention, get sucked into the game as their chosen game characters.

Two boys. Two girls. One of the girls gets stuck in the body of Shelley Oberon-(a man. not a woman, as the girl thought) Aka "an overweight, middle-aged man". This makes the girl, Bethany, and her avatar, played by Jack Black, the bud of the jokes in the entire film. Lead character, Spencer, whose avatar is the fearless Smolder Bravestone, played by Dwayne Johnson. Following, are Spencer's friend "Fridge" avatar-Franklin "Moose" Finbar, played by none other than Kevin Hart, Last you have a shy, anti-P.E girl Martha, avatar- Ruby Roundhouse, played by Karen Gillan. Let me just say that Gillan is queen of buttkicking. Black and Hart are hilarious, Johnson is the leader.

The action sequences go hand-in-hand with film and well, "Jumanji". The action is all-in part by the efforts of the comedy and with the desire to save jumanji and get out of the game. It's exciting. It's crazy and thrilling overall.

Composer Henry Jackman, makes a wild score while also recreating the infamous drums sounds from the original film. When you hear that sound, you know something crazy is coming. Jackmans score gives the film an extra boost of energy, rightly so, that it would still be enjoyable if no score, just the drums were used for a dramatic effect.

Ladies and Gentlemen. May I introduce to you Guns N' Roses, singing their hit song "Welcome to The Jungle". Okay, all jokes aside. This film has it all. Action. Hilarity and heart. Williams charcter, Allan Parrish, was paid homage in this film which made it all the more touching. This film is surprisingly one of the years best action and comedic films.

Rate: A 

Director: Jake Kasdan 

Starring: Dwayne Johnson, Kevin Hart, Karen Gillan, Jack Black 

MPAA Rating: PG-13-(for adventure action, suggestive content and some language)

Runtime: 2 Hours 

Synopsis: When four high-school kids discover an old video game console with a game they've never heard of--Jumanji--they are immediately drawn into the game's jungle setting, literally becoming the avatars they chose: gamer Spencer becomes a brawny adventurer (Dwayne Johnson); football jock Fridge loses (in his words) "the top two feet of his body" and becomes an Einstein (Kevin Hart); popular girl Bethany becomes a middle-aged male professor (Jack Black); and wallflower Martha becomes a badass warrior (Karen Gillan). What they discover is that you don't just play Jumanji--you must survive it. To beat the game and return to the real world, they'll have to go on the most dangerous adventure of their lives, discover what Alan Parrish left 20 years ago, and change the way they think about themselves--or they'll be stuck in the game forever...

Malawski’s Movie Rating System

A+ = Exceptional, One of a Kind, Masterpiece. Definite award season contender
A= Pure enjoyment, happy feeling. Satisfaction
A- = One to remember. Unforgettable
B+ = Can get a little over the top. But, it makes out as a good film.
B= This film has the potential to be better. Lacks in consistency
B- = Watches occasionally
C+ = Guilty pleasure territory
C= Causes viewer frustration due to lack of depth in the story
C-= Meh
D+ = I hated this movie. Some parts were good. Overall, the film was garbage
D= Very few to no good parts about this movie
D- = Minimal qualities of excellence
F= Don’t even bother watching it. It’s that bad.

Photo: Columbia Pictures

Sunday, December 17, 2017

Star Wars: The Last Jedi (2017)

The eighth installment of the sci-fi saga picks up directly where episode 7 ends.  The shot of Rey-(Daisy Ridley) on an island located on some planet wasteland- handing a powerful lightsaber to a lonesome Luke Skywalker-(Mark Hamill). And the rest is history. It's definitely one of the more action action-packed films in the series. It entertains from start to finish, despite it having a less than exciting ending getting people confused after that. All the while, this addition to the "Star Wars" franchise, is exciting and emotional, and funny.

I could care less about a tribute to Han Solo, -(but it would be nice to have had.) It's the fact that seeing other characters reel in what happened to him is quite the tear-jerker. In this movie, the millennial with daddy issues, aka Kylo Ren, aka Ben Solo, is still an evil apprentice to the supreme leader of the notorious "First Order". And just as things started to get right with him, he still manages to be seduced by the dark side. Not only does this film have one villain but it also has another one. Well, I guess you could say they're one in the same. The military leader of the "First Order", General Hux, alongside the supreme leader, are as psychotic as Ren.

The film introduces us to new and vital characters- Rose and Admiral Holdo. They play an important part in the defeat of the "First Order." Even though I kinda think they're just pawns- not needed. But they still make good contributions to this film.

Director Rian Johnson takes us to new and soaring heights with the film. He adds something different to the saga, that I was unfamiliar with before. It is the elements of color and detail. Yes, all the films in the saga are detailed and action-packed, but this one has lots of color and detail to the film as a whole.

The returning cast members: Daisy Ridley, Oscar Isacc, Adam Driver and John Boyega stun alongside franchise veterans: Mark Hamill and the late, Carrie Fisher. They all give remarkable performances as the characters that have defined their careers. Especially, Ridley and Driver. They're the two standouts of this film and it's amazing to see their interaction.

Lo and beyond, John Williams. In my opinion, there would be no "Star Wars" and dramatic open crawl if he wasn't in the picture. For this film, he ups the ante on all musical efforts. It's the same ole John Williams, doing what he does best. And it's insane that at 84 years old, he still makes iconic music. I have no doubt his musical presence will remain long after he is one with the force-(this is my own version of a euphemism for death).

One of the most influential cinematic sagas of all time, "Star Wars", has graced audiences for an impressive eighth film-40 years since the start of it all. This film is the culmination of the franchise and the highest of highs for the sci-fi film genre. Though this film suffers from small stuff like the inclusion of those previously mentioned characters and minor setbacks, and a horrendous ending, this installment to one of cinema's most beloved sagas, is one to remember.

Rate: B+

Director: Rian Johnson 

Starring: Daisy Ridley, Mark Hamill, Carrie Fisher, John Boyega, Oscar Isacc, with Adam Driver and Domnhall Gleeson and Andy Serkis

MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for sci-fi action, violence and some language)

Runtime: 2 Hours and 30 Minutes 

Syonopsis: Rey develops her newly discovered abilities with the guidance of Luke Skywalker, who is unsettled by the strength of her powers. Meanwhile, the Resistance prepares to do battle with the First Order.

Photo Courtsey of LucasFilms








































Malawski’s Movie Rating System

A+ = Exceptional, One of a Kind, Masterpiece. Definite award season contender
A= Pure enjoyment, happy feeling. Satisfaction
A- = One to remember. Unforgettable
B+ = Can get a little over the top. But, it makes out as a good film.
B= This film has the potential to be better. Lacks in consistency
B- = Watches occasionally
C+ = Guilty pleasure territory
C= Causes viewer frustration due to lack of depth in the story
C-= Meh
D+ = I hated this movie. Some parts were good. Overall, the film was garbage
D= Very few to no good parts about this movie
D- = Minimal qualities of excellence
F= Don’t even bother watching it. It’s that bad.






































Saturday, December 9, 2017

Ferdinand (2017)

He's a social outcast, a softy, and a flower bull-(meaning that he likes to sniff any flower he sees.) But most of all, he is a bull with a big heart. Based on the children's book, this animated adaptation is filled with splendor. It's got an emotional side of animated films not seen since "UP". Adventure is definitely out there for the "big little guy".

What's great about this film is that it has something for everyone. The adult humor in this will go right over youngsters heads, like a scene in which Ferdinand is literally a "Bull in a China shop". He was made to be terrifying and born to fight. He decides that he doesn't want to live that traditional life. From the makers of "Ice Age" , comes a children's film for the ages.

What makes this film wonderful, is the craft and overall presentation of what the film is. Veteran "Blue Sky" director Carlos Saldanha uses the source material to depict the film as accurate as possible. I didn't read the book when I was little, but, this film serves as a substitute for that. The animation in this film is spectacular. The detail Saldanha has here is very intriguing. I was in awe of the animated the whole time.

The cast of the film is very unique in the ways of energy brought to the film. John Cena plays the title character in charming fashion. He has energy and charisma with the experience of being in a kids atmosphere, (He has hosted Nickelodeon's Kids Choice Awards). He just comes across as a cheery and all around fun guy when you hear him in this film.

Also starring is the ever so funny Kate McKinnon who we saw in last years (Angry Birds Movie). She is at the hip of our main man, or bull I should say, during his ups and downs. You also have newcomer Lily Day. Day, who plays "Nina", Ferdinand's owner, does an excellent job at adding constant emotional effects to the film and to the other characters.

Not only does this film have adult humor and emotional plots, it has action. The action in this movie is stellar (for a children's film). But, adults can enjoy it as much as the little ones.

To go right along with the action, emotional aspects and humor, John Powell creates a score that keeps audiences on their toes. Also with the addition of an original tune by Nick Jonas, that is very upbeat and makes the film more on its toes.

Hidden in the film, are some lessons for youngsters but also for teens and adults. Such take away themes would be: Be different. Don't listen to those who try and bring you down. Make your path. We see this evidently in the eyes of Ferdinand, which makes this film ultimately special. is the themes hidden within it.

Mess with the bull, you're gonna get the horns. This metaphor is taken quite literally, because of the nature of the film. 2017 hasn't seen the likes of many animated films. But, it's refreshing to see that this film marks as one of the years best animated films.



Photo courtesy of Blue Sky Studios















Rate: A-

Director: Carlos Saldanha 

Starring: John Cena, Kate McKinnon, Anthony Anderson, with Lily Day and Bobby Cannavale

MPAA Rating:  PG (for rude humor, action and some thematic elements)

Runtime: 1 Hour and 45 Minutes 

Synopsis: A giant but gentle bull must find a way to break free from his captors and return home to his family.

 Malawski’s Movie Rating System

A+ = Exceptional, One of a Kind, Masterpiece. Definite award season contender
A= Pure enjoyment, happy feeling. Satisfaction
A- = One to remember. Unforgettable
B+ = Can get a little over the top. But, it makes out as a good film.
B= This film has the potential to be better. Lacks in consistency
B- = Watches occasionally
C+ = Guilty pleasure territory
C= Causes viewer frustration due to lack of depth in the story
C-= Meh
D+ = I hated this movie. Some parts were good. Overall, the film was garbage
D= Very few to no good parts about this movie
D- = Minimal qualities of excellence

F= Don’t even bother watching it. It’s that bad.

Wednesday, December 6, 2017

Get Out (2017)

The one movie this year that is psychologically twisted, and thought-provoking. It is a movie that toys with your inner mind and thought, with so much originality and depth making it all the more memorable. What this film triumphs at, is the constant sense of depth and a riveting narrative to play out on screen. Unlike Christopher Nolan's "Inception", this film has heart, humor and twists at every corner, like "you didn't see that coming!" It was unknown to me that a film of this kind could be as entertaining, while tackling some touchy issues like racism and slavery.

I was impressed beyond belief. For his directorial debut, half of the comedic duo Key and Peele, Jordan Peele. Peele crafts an immense film, in regards to the subject, story line and characters. He certainly has made a name for himself as a director.  He does whatever he can to get audiences talking. It works to the highest level. I know that I will remember this film for a long time.

Practically new to the screen, Daniel Kaluuya  shines as the protagonist of this film. He shines in the seriousness that surrounds this film and all around plays his character in an emotional way. While also bringing humor and a lighter side to the film. Opposite Kaluuya, is Allison Williams-(Yes, she's the daughter of disgraced journalist Brian Williams.) Williams plays a charming woman who is in a relationship with Kaluuya's character. Come to find out that she is more than meets the eye. Her character is the least you'd suspect of being someone else. Just you wait.

Also starring in the film is Catherine Keener. She plays Williams on screen mom and she is just as psychotic as her daughter. Keener's character is a therapist who specializes in hypnosis. What's even more terrifying, is that her character manipulates the senses of our leading man. It's so intriguing to see the effects of something as satanic as hypnosis can really be.

The film starts off in the night, an incident, for whatever reason, occurs and it has an edge-of-your-seat, gnawing on your nails feeling. You just saw something unbelievable, and you want answers to that stunning turn of events.

A haunting and suspenseful composition crafted Michael Abels, is at the epicenter of all the films madness. It works so beautifully, that it makes the film even more shocking than ever. With the elements of whispering and the traditional horror film score vibe-(The Exorcist and Jaws), this score gets the job done with getting audiences on the edge-out-their seats.

This film jumps right into the deep end, in regards to the touchy issues I mentioned earlier. This film has done an outstanding job at keeping its audience engaged and curious about what will happen next. It successes are at the center of its subject matter and the way it was presented.As a result of what I think is a politically unbiased, and conversation starter film, "Get Out" is my number one favorite film, praise or down right horrible, this film has rightfully earned all the praise, and its spot in the cinema archives as being one of the 21st century's best cinematic experiences.

Rate: A+ 
                 

Photo Courtesy of Universal Pictures



























Director: Jordan Peele

Starring: Daniel Kaluuya, Allison Williams, Catherine Keener, Bradley Whitford, with Caleb Landry Jones and Stephen Root 

MPAA Rating R-(for violence, bloody images, and language including sexual references)                                                                                                                                                                
Runtime: 1 Hour and 45 Minutes

Synopsis: 
Now that Chris (Daniel Kaluuya) and his girlfriend, Rose (Allison Williams), have reached the meet-the-parents milestone of dating, she invites him for a weekend getaway upstate with Missy and Dean. At first, Chris reads the family's overly accommodating behavior as nervous attempts to deal with their daughter's interracial relationship, but as the weekend progresses, a series of increasingly disturbing discoveries lead him to a truth that he never could have imagined.                                                                                                                                                                                                  Malawski’s Movie Rating System

A+ = Exceptional, One of a Kind, Masterpiece. Definite award season contender
A= Pure enjoyment, happy feeling. Satisfaction
A- = One to remember. Unforgettable
B+ = Can get a little over the top. But, it makes out as a good film.
B= This film has the potential to be better. Lacks in consistency
B- = Watches occasionally
C+ = Guilty pleasure territory
C= Causes viewer frustration due to lack of depth in the story
C-= Meh
D+ = I hated this movie. Some parts were good. Overall, the film was garbage
D= Very few to no good parts about this movie
D- = Minimal qualities of excellence
F= Don’t even bother watching it. It’s that bad.
                                                                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Sunday, November 26, 2017

Justice League (2017)


Justice League (2017)







Photo courtesy of DC Films

SCORE: A Film Music Documentary (2017)

It is one of the most essential pieces of a film. The film score. It's like the buns on a burger. You need something to hold it together for stability. That's what film scores do. The hold the movie in perfect balance-(Or at least try to). No film that I have seen would ever be as successful without the music. It just wouldn't be the same. The effect of the film would be minimal. I personally think that a film cannot work with out a score. This film documents the blood, sweat and tears that composers have to endure with making the perfect score.

Some of cinemas most well known music makers such as: Hans Zimmer, Tom Holkenborg(Junkie XL), John Williams and Danny Elfman reveal their experiences as renowned film composers and what challenges they face on their films. Director Matt Schrader, erects a film unlike any other. For those who are curious enough to know about the process of composing film music, this film has all the informative aspects you will need.

Every time you watch a movie, you can't help but feel some emotional connection to the score. That is what they intended to do with audiences right? I know I do. Especially when I watch films with Zimmer and Williams scores. They draw you in like you wouldn't believe. They make the films more exciting as if the film is alive.

You can't go inside a cinema thinking you don't feel some kind of reaction from the scores. Because if you say no, you're lying to yourself. This is a unique genre of music that stretches beyond the cinema scope and to the lands off screen.

Film scores are what make up the background of the film. They are essential in ways that make their films all the more meaningful. That's what makes this genre of music, element of film, and the curators so special, is that they all have the power to make a film spectacular. We have to owe it to these incredible maestros. Otherwise, our cinematic experiences would be completely different.

Rate: A+

SCORE: A Film Music Documentary
Photo courtesy of Gravitas Ventures 

Spielberg (2017)

When you think  of a Steven Spielberg movie, what first comes to mind? "Jurassic Park. ET? Jaws?" Whatever it is, he has made an impact on your cinema experience.  He is considered the greatest director who's ever lived. Rightfully so. Famed director Steven Spielberg, has spanned some 40 years in the film industry. with some critically acclaimed and controversial films. He is no doubt mine and millions of others favorite directors.

In this tell all, Spielberg unloads the secrets and drawbacks to his illustrious career as one of the most celebrated film directors of our time. It is unreal to see with all its fascination. This film is one of the best documentaries I have ever seen and possibly the best movie of 2017 for me. (Sorry Baby Driver).

What makes this film so unique, is the beauty and joy that he brings to his stories and how he came to be. Director Susan Lacy, crafts a special film that those who've followed him from his earlier days, will find sentimental value. From close friends, family and fellow Directors, their insight to this cinematic artistic genius is truly inspiring. Especially with the commentary of Spielberg himself.

All the while, this film acts as a motivation for future directors and anyone who wants to be in the film industry-(like myself). It does so well in the emotional impact it has on viewers. This film is truly remarkable and touching in ways that I wanted to learn more about him and crave his advice so deeply.
Spielberg Poster
Photo courtesy of HBO


















Rate: A 

Malawski’s Movie Rating System

A+ = Exceptional, One of a Kind, Masterpiece. Definite award season contender
A= Pure enjoyment, happy feeling. Satisfaction
A- = One to remember. Unforgettable
B+ = Can get a little over the top. But, it makes out as a good film.
B= This film has the potential to be better. Lacks in consistency
B- = Watches occasionally
C+ = Guilty pleasure territory
C= Causes viewer frustration due to lack of depth in the story
D+ = I hated this movie. Some parts were good. Overall, the film was garbage
D= Very few to no good parts about this movie
D- = Minimal qualities of excellence

F= Don’t even bother watching it. It’s that bad.

Sunday, November 5, 2017

Thor: Ragnarok (2017)

Since the Thor franchise kicked off in 2011, its films have been a huge let down for fans of the “God of Thunder” and Marvel films in general. Audiences now have a third film to see Chris Hemsworth in action as the eponymous character the film is based on. I was never a huge fan of this film franchise, but I’m glad that the series has redeemed itself with this installment.

Throughout the series, the films have been more serious and overly dramatic while offering little comedic efforts. This film manages to pull off all elements in spectacular fashion. Not only did the action draw me into this film, but it’s improvised humor and dialogue was absolutely astonishing. I was laughing during the entire film. It’s that hilarious.

Director Taika Waititi does an awesome job crafting the film while showcasing all its genuine glory.  You can see it play out on screen. The comedic elements in this film made it not only more memorable than other Marvel films,  but this film is the funniest of all prior Marvel films up to this point.

Not only does the film succeed on hilarity, but its action creates memorable parts to the film as well. The action is everywhere and colorful; it’s a job well done. This film’s cast brings action and comedy to new heights. I won’t give anything away, but Hulk stands out as the major comedic relief here. And it’s utterly fantastic.

An 80’s video game, Esq Score by Mark Mothersbaugh, is also an important part of the success of the film. It electrifies every scene that shines on the screen. This score is a wonderful combination of the scenes in the film, hilarious or not. This film also features a popular Led Zeppelin song that acts in place of the score for some action sequences. 

Bravo Marvel! The studio and the film’s director made a film that has everything a fan of superhero movies could ever want. It’s so satisfying because of everything this film has. Making it my favorite film unearthed from the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
Thor is mighty powerful in his latest film
Photo courtesy of Marvel Studios 

Sunday, October 8, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

It was basically the "Terminator", but focuses more so on the sci-fi parts rather than the characters. Don't get me wrong, it was a good film, just not spectacular in anyway. This film sequel to the 1982 predecessor, may entertain fans of the prior film, and those who have a hankering for sci-fi films. "Blade Runner" is based on Philip K. Dicks groundbreaking novel. It's not extraordinary,  it's just meh.

In 2049, I'll be 49. And I have no doubt the world I live in today will be completely different when that year comes. Like the Arnold Schwarzenegger hit, this film has robots disguised as humans. They are known as "replicants". But unlike the famed Schwarzenegger films, this film lacks heavily on depth, character evolvement and story development.

Arrival director  Denis Villeneuve helms the long awaited sequel to the 1982 film. He achieves the ultimate goal of entertaining audiences, but something's missing. Other sci-fi films, like "Arrival", succeed in the areas this film failed to.

Ryan Gosling and Harrison Ford walk into a bar... You better expect some saloon type showdown. I feel sorry for the person wanting to pick a fight with either of two. Oh wait! No, I'm not. Ye who casts the first stone gets what is coming for em.

The two pair up and it's not as exciting as advertised. Shame! Ford's character is old and senile. Gosling on the other hand, is just as miserable as Ford's guy. So, minus ten more points for Gryffindor! Wait, this isn't Harry Potter.  It's still doesn't provide quality acting even for small moments like: laughs and emotion. Ugh! NEXT!

Quite possibly the best part of this movie-(aside from action goes) is the yet again brilliant Hans Zimmer crafting (at the last minute. Original composer Johann Johannsson left the project) an eerie, futuristic kind of sound. It's one of Zimmer's more achievable scores than we've heard recently.

For a runtime of two and a half hours, you'd think I'd be in for a treat. But, since my expectations were too much to handle for this film, I'd say this is like a few other 2017 film flops. There are better films in this genre anyway.



Rate: C- 

Director: Denis Villeneuve 


Starring: Ryan Gosling, Harrison Ford, Robin Wright, Jared Leto


MPAA Rating: R-(for violence, some sexuality, nudity and language)



Photo Courtesy of Warner Bros 


Synopsis: 
Thirty years after the events of the first film, a new blade runner, LAPD Officer K (Ryan Gosling), unearths a long-buried secret that has the potential to plunge what's left of society into chaos. K's discovery leads him on a quest to find Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford), a former LAPD blade runner who has been missing for 30 years.


Runtime: 2 Hours and 44 Minutes














Thursday, September 21, 2017

Kingsman: The Golden Circle (2017)

British charm meets the American psycho. It is no doubt that the predecessor of the “Golden Circle” was wacky and chaotic beyond belief. But, the sequel to 2014’s “ Kingsman: The Secret Service” may be more wild than before. What this sequel has the opportunity to do is provide even more demented action and crass language and humor than in the first film. And man does it succeed.

In this film, we see the reprise of the characters you liked in the original film: Colin Firth’s (Harry), Taron Egerton (Eggsy) and Mark Strong’s (Merlin). Audiences will be marveled at not only the butt-kicking team work and skills of the Kingsman, but will enjoy the unlikely team-up with the Statesman, an american counterpart.

From Egerton to Statesman’s (Whiskey), actor Pedro Pascal, the insanity and the magnitude of everything you’d expect from a spy movie, it is incredible.

Helming the second installment  is Matthew Vaughn. Vaughn directed the 2014 hit film. As they say: First is worst- (Not this case) and second is best. It depends on how good a film like this or any film, actually, is so that studios can make continuations to one film.

Vaughn amps up the creativity and mind blowing special effects, fast-paced, edgy action sequences and CGI. in my opinion, 2017’s best spy film. Merely, because of those reasons.

Well, not just those reasons. The humor throughout the film may not be as racist and questionable as the first film, but offers genuine hilarity. The fictitious spy agency which the film is greatly named, has their agents named after royalty figures. While in the American agency, every agent is named after an alcoholic beverage.

Thank god that we as an audience didn’t have to suffer by hearing a villain with a lisp - paging Richmond Valentine, aka Samuel L. Jackson. Instead, this time, the villain is a ridiculously charming yet psychotic woman. Julianne Moore plays the devilishly demented woman in a quest to dominate the world.

One of the many other aspects of hilarity in the movie, is the inclusion of Fox News. Which is used for the coverage of the events surrounding our villain and her mischievous plans.

2017 hasn’t be great in terms of films like this, but it’s absolutely refreshing to have seen this as an improvement from the first film. Audiences worldwide will be begging for more of these films because of their uniqueness.

Rate: A-
Image result for kingsman 2 poster
Photo: 20th Century Fox and Marv Films


















Starring: Taron Egerton, Colin Firth, Julianne Moore, Mark Strong

Director: Matthew Vaughn

Runtime: 2 Hours & 21 Minutes

MPAA Rating: R-(for Language throughout, Drug content, sequences of strong violence and some sexual material

Synopsis:  With their headquarters destroyed and the world held hostage, members of Kingsman find new allies when they discover a spy organization in the United States known as Statesman. In an adventure that tests their strength and wits, the elite secret agents from both sides of the pond band together to battle a ruthless enemy and save the day, something that's becoming a bit of a habit for Eggsy.


Malawski’s Movie Rating System

A+ = Exceptional, One of a Kind, Masterpiece. Definite award season contender
A= Pure enjoyment, happy feeling. Satisfaction
A- = One to remember. Unforgettable
B+ = Can get a little over the top. But, it makes out as a good film.
B= This film has the potential to be better. Lacks in consistency
B- = Watches occasionally
C+ = Guilty pleasure territory
C= Causes viewer frustration due to lack of depth in the story
D+ = I hated this movie. Some parts were good. Overall, the film was garbage
D= Very few to no good parts about this movie
D- = Minimal qualities of excellence

F= Don’t even bother watching it. It’s that bad.  

Sunday, September 10, 2017

IT (2017)

Pennywise the Dancing clown preys on youth every 27 years. It's no coincidence that the miniseries based on this horrifying being get a motion picture 27 years following that miniseries. As Dash’s teacher from The Incredibles said: “Coincidence, I THINK NOT!” IT is a horror induced film and it is perhaps one of the decade's best.


Now, step right up to witness the amazing and psychotic portrayal of the title character. Played by Bill Skarsgard, son, and brother of actors Stellan and Alexander Skarsgard. Bill does an absolutely terrifying performance and it's without a doubt one of the more memorable villain roles.


Not only does Skarsgard shine, but the stars of the “Losers Club” are also among the highlights of the film. Stranger Things star Finn Wolfhard luminates as the comedic relief, while the other members are the emotional efforts of the film.


Andy Muschietti director of the film, gets genuine and flat out scary moments in this stomach churning horror masterpiece.


On top of his stellar efforts making this film as scary as possible, the score, make-up, costumes and special effects are stunning to the core. Hair raising, and spin tingling.


“You’ll float too!” This film is an absolute rush from start to finish. Even if you have to hold on to something for two hours. I have no doubt this adaptation of the “master of horrors” novel will become an example for future horror movies to come.


Rate: A


Photo: Warner Bros.











Director: Andy Muschietti

Starring: Bill Skarsgard, Finn Wolfhard, Jaeden Lieberher

MPAA Rating: R -( for violence/horror, bloody images, and for language)

Synopsis: "IT," directed by Andy Muschietti ("Mama"), is based on the hugely popular Stephen King novel of the same name, which has been terrifying readers for decades. When children begin to disappear in the town of Derry, Maine, a group of young kids are faced with their biggest fears when they square off against an evil clown named Pennywise, whose history of murder and violence dates back for centuries.


Saturday, August 19, 2017

Logan Lucky (2017)

For a film that has its roots in director Steven Soderbergh's acclaimed "Oceans" heist film franchise, this film has a look that is sorta, without a doubt redneck, hillbilly type. It's the complete opposite of that saga. This film takes on the status quo in hopes of regaining fame. What happens when you get the unlikely talents of: Daniel Craig, Channing Tatum and Adam Driver, it's as if beavis and butthead had a huge family curse and needed--(wanted) to pull off a cash and grab heist.

Typically, as stereotypes assume that those who inhabit the southern region of America you are: A. a slob, B. redneck, C. hillbilly or D. all of them. But as it turns out, in this film, there are some pretty intelligent folks down south. Well, in this film, yes, minus two. So as the old saying goes: Don't judge a book by the cover. Even so, for a film, it pulls off a hilarious and even if a little rough, take on southern folk--- if the people down there were just itching to pull off a huge money infested heist. 

Director of this here rodeo, is Steven Soderbergh. Curator of the previously mentioned "Oceans" films. He successfully if not just a little tediously produced comedic-action film. What makes this film quirky yet entertaining is its wit. The cast of "Logan Lucky" makes up what this film was made to do-- produce laughs out loud and strangely entertaining action sequences. 

But, as far as negatives go, the accents heard here, are probably, if  not, the worst parts about this film. It's as if i'm listening to chalk on a chalkboard, or hearing- (at least in my head,)Samuel L. Jackson's lisp from Kingsman: The Secret Service. 

As far as acting goes and memorable moments: Daniel Craig is the man. He is so entertaining and full of energy and charisma that is highly noted. 

Other than that, minus a few unfixed kinks in the pace in the film, it's an entertaining film. Even though the acting may not be superb, but at least one things for certain: it's comical. So, this film may not have it all like: wonderful acting, but at least this film is entertaining for most of its entirety. 

Rate: B 

Director: Steven Soderbergh 

Starring: Channing Tatum, Adam Driver,  Katie Holmes, Daniel Craig, Katherine Waterston,with Sebastian Stan and Hilary Swank 

MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for language and some crude comments) 

Runtime: 2 Hours 

Synopsis: Trying to reverse a family curse, brothers Jimmy (Channing Tatum) and Clyde Logan (Adam Driver) set out to execute an elaborate robbery during the legendary Coca-Cola 600 race at the Charlotte Motor Speedway. 


Photo: Bleeker Street Studios
















Malawski’s Movie Rating System

A+ = Exceptional, One of a Kind, Masterpiece. Definite award season contender
A= Pure enjoyment, happy feeling. Satisfaction
A- = One to remember. Unforgettable
B+ = Can get a little over the top. But, it makes out as a good film.
B= This film has the potential to be better. Lacks in consistency
B- = Watches occasionally
C+ = Guilty pleasure territory
C= Causes viewer frustration due to lack of depth in the story
D+ = I hated this movie. Some parts were good. Overall, the film was garbage
D= Very few to no good parts about this movie
D- = Minimal qualities of excellence
F= Don’t even bother watching it. It’s that bad.  





Saturday, August 12, 2017

Atomic Blonde (2017)

No one better pick a fight with Charlize Theron. In her latest, she essentially is Double 07 and Ethan Hunt rolled into one. This film is unique in every sense of the word. It has all you want in an action-packed, butt kicking film. This film is kind of like that one lady in a store on black friday in line for something, but someone else wants it too. So she fights that other person.

What makes this film quite one of the year's best action films is essentially-its star. The action as well. But, Theron is an utter boss when it comes to taking down the bad guys. She makes this film not only entertaining to the max, but sexy. She flourishes with beauty and style in this movie.

David Leitch directs an action-packed, kick butt, and overall exciting film. He makes the film look so fresh and original, that you can clearly see on screen. It's refreshing to see original action films- because it's all prior work based films these days.

Aside from the great action in this film, music is also very entertaining in this film as well. Including a score that amps up the film on a new level. Plus, a plethora of songs from the 1980's- the time period of this film.

Other than Theron giving an entertaining performance here, we've got James McAvoy and none than the films bad guys. Seeing McAvoy and the bad guys alongside Theron adds just as much spice to the film.

Viewers for decades have seen action sagas in film. Film sagas like: James Bond and Mission Impossible, have become a milestone for films of this nature. But, it's also nice to see original films of this kind too, that aren't solely based on a prior work.

Rate: B+ 

Director: David Leitch 

Starring: Charlize Theron, James McAvoy, John Goodman, Toby Jones, Sofia Boutella 

MPAA Rating: R (for sequences of strong violence, language throughout, and some sexuality/nudity) 

Runtime: 1 Hour and 55 Minutes 

Synopsis: Sensual and savage, Lorraine Broughton is the most elite spy in MI6, an agent who's willing to use all of her lethal skills to stay alive during an impossible mission. With the Berlin Wall about to fall, she travels into the heart of the city to retrieve a priceless dossier and take down a ruthless espionage ring. Once there, she teams up with an embedded station chief to navigate her way through the deadliest game of spies. 



Photo: Focus Features 
















Malawski’s Movie Rating System

A+ = Exceptional, One of a Kind, Masterpiece. Definite award season contender
A= Pure enjoyment, happy feeling. Satisfaction
A- = One to remember. Unforgettable
B+ = Can get a little over the top. But, it makes out as a good film.
B= This film has the potential to be better. Lacks in consistency
B- = Watches occasionally
C+ = Guilty pleasure territory
C= Causes viewer frustration due to lack of depth in the story
D+ = I hated this movie. Some parts were good. Overall, the film was garbage
D= Very few to no good parts about this movie
D- = Minimal qualities of excellence
F= Don’t even bother watching it. It’s that bad. 

Annabelle: Creation (2017)

Let me just say it plain and simple: this movie was an atrocity to the horror film genre. There were virtually nothing good about this film. Some of the scary moments were good. But overall, nothing spectacular about this film. I'd say that even though I am not a diehard horror film fan, those who are will be very disappointed in this film. Due to its lack of scariness and well, overall boringness.

Need I say more? This film is just so dumb. It plagues with fake scares from its characters and it has pretty much no story development. And to make matters worse, it was predictable. Like you knew what to expect what was coming. And sure enough, these things come true in the end. 

Director David Sandberg (Lights Out) conjures an utterly waste of potential. There's practically nothing original about this film. Considering this film is part of a series of films that have continued to earn mega dollars, this film has fallen prey to awful storytelling as a sequel to a film. 

Under no circumstances is the acting in here worth praise. It's fake and scripted, nothing special. It does however fit right into the garbage that is this film. 

Though the film is utter garbage, some parts of this film aren't bad. Some of the film does offer genuine frights. I'd say every time the self titled doll: Annabelle appeared on screen or something as freaky as a door opening-automatically, when she wouldn't be there are some of the film best moments. Also, would say that parts where the doll goes full on satanic--- such as when she kills residents of this house. 

One of the films few other good qualities was the haunting and chilling score. It resembles a Stephen King esque score and is very effective. But it's not enough to save the film from falling into the depths of hell. 

For a runtime of just under two hours, everything feels as if it's muddled together with a pinch of- no, a heaping pile of sloppiness. Horror film fans will be truly disappointed in this film. There's definitely other films out there worth your time. 

Rate: D- 

Director: David Sandberg 

Starring: Stephanie Sigman, Lulu Wilson, Talitha Bateman 

MPAA Rating: R (for horror violence and terror) 

Synopsis: A couple still grieving the death of their daughter take in children from a local orphanage, but the family are soon terrorized by a demented doll known as Annabelle. 

Runtime: 1 Hour and 50 Minutes 

Image result
Photo: New Line Cinema
















Malawski’s Movie Rating System

A+ = Exceptional, One of a Kind, Masterpiece. Definite award season contender
A= Pure enjoyment, happy feeling. Satisfaction
A- = One to remember. Unforgettable
B+ = Can get a little over the top. But, it makes out as a good film.
B= This film has the potential to be better. Lacks in consistency
B- = Watches occasionally
C+ = Guilty pleasure territory
C= Causes viewer frustration due to lack of depth in the story
D+ = I hated this movie. Some parts were good. Overall, the film was garbage
D= Very few to no good parts about this movie
D- = Minimal qualities of excellence
F= Don’t even bother watching it. It’s that bad.


Wednesday, August 9, 2017

The Dark Tower (2017)

From the thrilling mind of horror novelist Stephen King, comes an intriguing adaptation to one of his bestselling series, "The Dark Tower". Unlike Kings prior and undoubtedly terrifying works- (IT, Carrie, Under the Dome), this movie is more so on a level that is consisted of being a thriller and one of science fiction. Surprisingly enough, it's a movie that delivers on the aspects of entertaining audiences.

I have never seen him so evil. Who am I referring to? None other than usually charming on screen: Matthew McConaughey. He is the films antagonist. Who just so happens to be a very powerful sorcerer. It weird to see him in this form because I hadn't pegged him to be an actor who could pull off being a villain. But it works, especially with his black clothing appearance.

Along with a terrifying and haunting McConaughey, there's two forces of light trying to vanquish the "man in black". Idris Elba-(Thor, Zootopia) plays a "gunslinger" who lives in the same dimension as this bad guy.

And finally, you have a young boy with remarkable capabilities to have "shines" or so called visions of the events of what will happen in the dimension where the self-titled "Dark Tower", our foe and part of hero reside. This young boy, "Jake Chambers" played by Tom Taylor, is portrayed squeamishly, but yet, still has good contributions to this film.

Adapting this 30 year old novel series is danish filmmaker Nikolaj Arcel (The Girl with The Dragon Tattoo). To me this somewhat unknown and up-and-coming director pulls off what I think what was supposed to be an entertaining film. He pulls it off with great action filled with vibrancy and consistency. Even though the acting isn't on par with the entertaining action sequences and somewhat predictable story, it's a job well done for Arcel.

To keep the film subject to its thrilling aspect, a haunting and fast-paced score by Junkie XL (Mad Max: Fury Road) is made to keep audiences continuously engaged in the film.

If you're looking for a good action-packed film, primarily relying on score and its original source material for which this film is based, you're in luck, because this movie is easily one of 2017's best action-sci-fi films.

Rate: B 

Starring: Matthew McConaughey, Idris Elba, Tom Taylor 

Director: Nikolaj Arcel

MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for thematic material including sequences of gun violence and action) 

Runtime: 1 Hour and 35 Minutes 

Synopsis: The last Gunslinger, Roland Deschain (Idris Elba), has been locked in an eternal battle with Walter O'Dim, also known as the Man in Black (Matthew McConaughey), determined to prevent him from toppling the Dark Tower, which holds the universe together. With the fate of the worlds at stake, good and evil will collide in the ultimate battle as only Roland can defend the Tower from the Man in Black. 




First Published on: www.kanelandkrier.com 








Photo: Columbia Pictures
















Malawski’s Movie Rating System

A+ = Exceptional, One of a Kind, Masterpiece. Definite award season contender
A= Pure enjoyment, happy feeling. Satisfaction
A- = One to remember. Unforgettable
B+ = Can get a little over the top. But, it makes out as a good film.
B= This film has the potential to be better. Lacks in consistency
B- = Watches occasionally
C+ = Guilty pleasure territory
C= Causes viewer frustration due to lack of depth in the story
D+ = I hated this movie. Some parts were good. Overall, the film was garbage
D= Very few to no good parts about this movie
D- = Minimal qualities of excellence
F= Don’t even bother watching it. It’s that bad.




Tuesday, July 25, 2017

Baby Driver (2017)

It's one of the most original films i've seen in a really long time. "Baby Driver"is without question and uncertainty, what an action film should be. So original, action-packed and highly entertaining, full throttle fun. This film is one of a kind. It is of sorts, an Americanized version of the ultra "Mad Max" films. This film is so unique and possessed with originality that this film is now my number one film (so far) of 2017.

Need I say more? Yes, of course I do. Director Edgar Wright, makes way with an action film that you have to see to believe. He makes the action so authentic that you can easily see that play out well on screen. The action seen in this movie is easily the best of what this year's action films have to offer. The action in this film is without a doubt consistent and is a vital part of the film's success.

As if this film couldn't get any better. This is one of the few films in hollywood that incorporates disability in film. This film includes the actual casting of a real disabled actor. In this film, a deaf man is not one of the main characters, but, is a vital part of the title character.

What's in a score anyway? Well, for this film we have songs inspired by prior decades and filled with pure nostalgia. This film breaks the usual classic composer and score look. The songs featured are its own score, essentially.  Even though the film idolizes song for score, there is indeed a traditional score. That goes along well with the film just as well as the songs.

The acting is great, but not as great as the action. You can see and feel the heart and emotional attitudes on screen with this cast. Sometimes, throughout the film, the acting can get a little overbearing. You'd expect that in a film with guns and bad guys everywhere though.

To make a long story short, the acting is an essential part of this film. Lead star Ansel Elgort (Divergent) does not disappoint. Unlike his prior acting gigs.

Ready. Set. Go! This film is awesome action-packed, funny, and charming. No question. You'd be doing yourself a disservice if you don't see this film. Yes, it's that amazing. I have no doubt in my mind that I won't be the only one talking about this film once more when award season 2018 rolls around.

Rate: A+ 

Director: Edgar Wright 

Starring: Ansel Elgort, Lilly James, Kevin Spacey, with Jamie Foxx and Jon Hamm

MPAA Rating: R-(for violence and language throughout.)

Synopsis: A talented, young getaway driver (Ansel Elgort) relies on the beat of his personal soundtrack to be the best in the game. But after being coerced into working for a crime boss (Kevin Spacey), he must face the music when a doomed heist threatens his life, love, and freedom.

Runtime: 1 Hour and 48 Minutes 


Poster Courtesy of TriStar Pictures